Listen and watch the trailer for a new podcast exploring the health questions people are obsessing over online, and exploring the weird and wonderful about the body.
Health-related studies often yield conflicting results, and making sense of them can be challenging.
Jose Luis Pelaez/Stone via Getty Images
Kimberly Johnson, Washington University in St. Louis and Amy Eyler, Washington University in St. Louis
If you see a health claim that seems too good – or too bad – to be true, take a moment to step back and assess the evidence.
Public health experts worry that factually inaccurate statements by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. threaten the public’s confidence in vaccines.
Andrew HarnikGetty Images
The health secretary has made many inaccurate statements about vaccines. But the science is clear that vaccines have dramatically reduced childhood illness, disability and death.
Vaccination is an example of how people make decisions in an interconnected system.
MichelleLWilson via iStock/Getty Images Plus
Health influencers – perhaps including Health Secretary RFK Jr. – are promoting the chemical as an elixir that improves memory and focus. But evidence for these claims is thin.
A protest in Brazil against mandatory COVID vaccinations and vaccine passports.
Isaac Fontana / Shutterstock.com
The story of Belle Gibson, ex-wellness influencer and convicted fraudster, is only the tip of the iceberg of content creators profiting from harmful health advice.
While there are plenty of patient perspectives on social media , resources from healthcare professionals are far fewer – and are often lower quality.
Influencers extoll the benefits of drinking raw milk over pasteurized milk, but there isn’t substantive evidence to support these claims.
AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall
Studies show that health misinformation on social media has led to fewer people getting vaccinated and more lives lost to COVID-19 and other life-threatening diseases.
How can fake news be managed without government overreach? Under the draft bill, platforms continue to be responsible for the content on their services – not governments.
Approach all information with some initial skepticism.
Guillermo Spelucin/Moment via Getty Images
Generative AIs may make up information they serve you, meaning they may potentially spread science misinformation. Here’s how to check the accuracy of what you read in an AI-enhanced media landscape.
It’s safe to say that Elon Musk has transformed Twitter.
Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto via Getty Images
The intersection of content management, misinformation, aggregated data about human behavior and crowdsourcing shows how fragile Twitter is and what would be lost with the platform’s demise.
The restraints on COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter are off.
AP Photo/Jeff Chiu
The spread of misinformation in many pandemics, including the smallpox and 1918 influenza outbreaks, have undermined efforts to contain infections and prevent deaths.
Tech giants such as Spotify like to claim they are platforms, not publishers, and aren’t editorially responsible for the content they host. But with COVID threatening lives, they have to do better.
It can be difficult to distinguish between the calls of sincere scientists for more research to reach greater certainty, and the politically motivated criticisms of science skeptics.
(Shutterstock)
Skeptics may make demands for absolute certainty to undermine science and delay action. Critiques may not be in the interest of advancing science and public health, but by someone with an agenda.